Douglas Walton (1942–2020)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
BOOK REVIEW Douglas Walton (1998). The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of
Douglas Walton (1998). The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. x + 304 pages. ISBN 0-80207987-3. Douglas Walton (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. xx + 315 pages. ISBN 0-8173-0922-5. Douglas Walton (1999). One-Sided Arguments. A Dialectical Analysis Of Bias. State University of New York Press, Albany. ...
متن کاملDOUGLAS WALTON After Analytic Philosophy , What ' s Next ? : An Analytic Philosopher ' s Perspective
Philosophy, at the moment, seems to be in a transition period in which analytic philosophy, of the sort that has been predominant, is giving way to something new. But what will come next? Deconstructive and hermeneutic philosophies seem to indicate the right directions to fit the current relativistic climate of thought, but have failed to yield enough of a useful structure or method to carry ph...
متن کاملJohn Walton (Lord Walton of Detchant)
Having graduated in medicine in 1945 after a shortened wartime course in Newcastle Medical School, then part of Durham University, I had actually served for several weeks before graduation as a house officer, first in medicine with Professor F J Nattrass and secondly in paediatrics with Sir James Spence. These were two notable and outstanding teachers whom I admired greatly, and, after demobili...
متن کاملWalton & Lodder
The literature on alternative dispute resolution tends to be dominated by the negotiation model of argumentation. This bargaining argumentation style differs from the argumentation models developed in AI & Law. In recent years several researchers acknowledged the value of argumentation theory for ODR. This paper focuses on an alternative model to supplement that of mere negotiation, namely a fo...
متن کاملWalton on Argument Structure
In previous work I argued against (i) the likelihood of finding a theoretically sound foundation for the linked/convergent distinction and (ii) the utility of the distinction even if a sound theoretical basis could be found. Here I subject Douglas Walton’s comprehensive discussion of the linked/convergent distinction found in Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory to careful scrutiny and argue ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Argument & Computation
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1946-2174,1946-2166
DOI: 10.3233/aac-190482